THESE TAKFIRI KAFFEREEN IN THE GARB OF MUSLIMS UNDER THE COMMAND OF ABU BAKR , IF HE IS STILL ALIVE , OR IF DEAD, WHO EVER TOOK OVER AFTER HIS FATAL DRONING TWICE AS WAS REPORTED HAVE KILLED BRITISH , AMERICAN AND FRENCH NATIONALS, NOW THEY HAVE KILLED Irani , Egyptian , UAE , French & Algerian Embassies PEOPLE, SO IT IS LOGICAL THAT ALL THESE NATIONS WILL NOT SPARE THESE VERY TERRORIST TILL THEY ARE SURE THAT NOT A SINGLE IS / ISIS CRIMINAL IS LEFT ANYWHERE ON THE GLOBE .
OR , ARE THEY ALL AFRAID OF JUST A FEW THOUSAND THOROGHLY MISGUIDED CRIMINALS WHO CLAIM TO ESTABLISH A SO CALLED ISLAMY KHILAFAH WHILE THEY THEMSEVES ARE BY NO MEANS ANY CLOSE TO ISLAM AND HAVE MERCILESSLY KILLED INNOCENT MUSLIMS OF ALL MUSLAKS AND SOME CHRISTIANS TOO .THEY THEMSELVES CLAIM TO BE SUNNI BUT THEY HAVE SHOT , KILLED BURNT & BEHEADED MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SUNNI MUSLIMS OF IRAQ AND SYRIA .
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Irani , Egyptian , UAE , French & Algerian Embassies Attacked , Atleast 40 People Killed in Car Bombs in Libya

JNN 25 Feb 2015 Tripoli : More than 40 people were killed and 70 injured in car bomb explosions in the eastern Libyan city of Qubbah (El Gubba, Quba) on Friday, parliamentary speaker Aguila Saleh said.
Saleh told Al-Arabiya television the car bombs had targeted a petrol station next to a security building. Qubbah is Saleh’s hometown.
He said the bombs appeared to be in retaliation for Egyptian airstrikes on extremist targets in the eastern city of Derna, which is close to Qubbah.

A REPLY TO A SERIES OF HATE MAILS ”IN DEFENCE OF AAL & ASHAAB ”

THE SLAVES OF SHAITAAN HAVE MADE IT THEIR HABIT TO MAKE SIMPLE THINGS COMPLICATED, SHORT MATTERS SO LENGTHY THAT THEY THEM SELVES BECOME CONFUSED SHALL REMAIN CONFUSED FOR EVER.

HADEES E SAQLAIN IS ONE OF MOST AUTHENTIC, UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED MOTAWATER HADEES WHICH IS THE RASOOL E KAREEM’S (saawaws) PARTING ADVISE TO CHOSE FROM HAQ TO BATIL . IT SIMPLY MEANS IF YOU DO KEEP TAMASSUK WITH THE AHLEBAYT E RASOOL(a) WHO ARE IMMACULATE & THE ONLY INFALLIBLES AND ARE THE FLESH & BLOOD OF THE RASOOL (saawaws). FOLLOW ONLY THEM THE QORA’AN E NATIQ AND THE QORA’AN E SAMIT, KEEP DISTANCE (bara’at) FROM THEIR ADVERSERIES , TO ENSURE YOURSELF NOT GOING ASTRAY & THEN ONLY YOU CAN EXPECT TO MEET HIS INTERCESSION FOR YOUR DELIBERANCE IN THE QAYAMAH .

IN RECENT DAYS SOME REVISED PUBLICATIONS OF AHLE SUNNAH DO HAVE HADEES E SAQLAIN BUT WITH SUNNAH SUBSTITUTED IN PLACE ITRATI/AHLEBAYTI . SUNNAH HERE OBVIOUSLY IS SO MISFIT ABSURD AND MEANINGLESS. FOR THIS I WOULD SUGGEST ONLY THIS, GO TO A REPUTED LIBRARY WHICH HAS ANCIENT / ORIGINAL VERSION OF THE BOOKS, YOU WILL FIND THE TRUTH

TO BE ON PERFECT EIMAAN YOU HAVE TO FOLLOW THE KULLE EIMAAN AND REFRAIN YOURSELF FROM THOSE WHO DID MUNAFEQAT , LEFT THE RASOOL E KAREEM (s) GRIEVIOUSLY INJURED IN BATTLES LIKE IN OHUD TO SAVE THEIR OWN WORTHLESS LIFE & DID NOT SPARE ANY EFFORTS TO HARM THE PAAK ITRAT E RASOOL (s) AFTER THE DEMISE OF THE PROPHET (s), EVEN INFLICTING INSULTS, HUMMILLIATION, HURT AND TERRORIST ATTAC K ON THE DOOR OF THE RASOOL’S ONLY DAUGHTER WHOSE HOUSE WAS TORCHED WHILE SHE WAS DEFENDING AT HER DOOR, THUS A VIOLENT PUSH ,CRUSHED HER SON IN THE WOMB AND SHE HERSELF ATTAINED MARTYRDOM DUE TO THE WOUNDS IN JUST A COUPLE OF MONTHS .SHE WAS SO ANGRY THAT SHE STOPPED TALKING , EVEN REQUESTED HER HUSBAND NOT TO INFORM THEM
WHEN SHE DIES, NOT ALLOW THEM IN HER FUNERAL AND HE (a s ) BURIED HERIN THE SECRACY OF THE DARKNESS OF NIGHT .

THE DEVOUT UMMAH SHALL NEVER FORGET THE MOST AUTHENTIC AHADEES OF THE RASOOL E KAREEM (saawaws) AS FOLLOWS .
1.INNI TAREKUM FI SAQLAIN , KITAB ALLAH WA ITRATI AHLEBAYTI ..
2. I DO NOT SEEK FROM YOU MU UMMAH ASMY AJR E RISALAT SAVE LOVE AND TAKING CARE OF MY ITRAT .
3.FATEMAH IS A PIECE OF MY FLESH, MY BLOOD, ONE WHO ANGERS HER, ANGERS ME THUS GETS THE WRATH OF ALLAH .

NOW KEEPING IN MIND THESE AHADEES ,HAVE A LOOK AT THE FOLLOWING VIDEO AND MAKE YOUR OWN INFERENCES.

Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 06:01:36 +0000
To: zaheerhusain@hotmail.com
From: comment-reply@wordpress.com
Subject: [New comment] Hadeeth Al-Thaqalayn(Two weighty Things) — The correct understanding and a spot-on perspective of Sunnis.

Respond to this comment by replying above this line
New comment on In Defense of the Aal & Ashaab

Hussaini commented on Hadeeth Al-Thaqalayn(Two weighty Things) — The correct understanding and a spot-on perspective of Sunnis..
in response to Slaves of Allah:
Hadeeth Al-Thaqalayn(Two weighty Things) — The correct understanding and a spot-on perspective of Sunnis. Bismillaahi Walĥamdulillaahi waŝŝalaatu wassalaamu ‘alaa rasoolillaahi We have divided this article in following divisions: I. Introduction II. Meaning of Thaql and Thaqalayn III. The correct Sunni explanation and interpretation of the AUTHENTIC versions of Hadeeth Thaqalayn. IV. What is the reason […]
JAZAKALLAHU KHAIRAN may Allah(swt)blessed you with this great work barakallahu fikum

IF THIS IS SAHEEH (RIGHT) THEN WHAT IS WRONG ?

SUNNIES ANSWERS ARE ALL ABSURD AND NONSENSE . THEIR FOUR FIQHS WRITTEN 200 YEARS AFTER THE DEMISE OF THE RASOOL E KAREEM(s) ARE HIGHLY INNOVATED, EXAGERATED AND CONTROVERT EACH OTHER SO MUCH SO THAT THE ADHERANT IMAMS AND FOLLOWERS CALL EACH OTHER KAFFIR.

ISLAM IS ONLY ONE AND ONLY THAT ONE ONLY IS CORRECT, ORIGINAL AND MAINSTREAM WHICH IS BASED ON THE SAYINGS OF QORA’AN , RASOOL(s) & HIS ITRAT . ISLAM BASED ON TRADITIONS ON AHLE SUNNAH WHICH AFTER THE SHAIKHAINS, WAS SPOILED FURTHER BY MOAVIAH AND HIS SON MALOUN , IS NO ISLAM , IT IS SIMPLY KUFR OR WAHABIYAT .

AHLE SUNNAH DEPENDS MUCH ON SO CALLED SAHEEH BOKHARI . IF YOU OPEN THIS WIERD BOOK YOU WILL FIND IT FULL OF SUCH AHADEES WHICH ARE ABSURD, IMPOSSIBLE TO BE WORDS OF RASOOL E KAREEM(s), OFTEN HALF PORNOGRAPHIC AND BLASPHEMOUS TO THE NOOR ALA NOOR . IT IS PITY THAT ADHERANT OF AHLE SUNNAH BELIEVE THEM TO BE TRUE THEIR AQAED AND PRACTICES ARE DEPENDENT ON THESE TRADITIONS SOME OF WHICH ARE SO EMBARSSING TO THE REAL MUSLIMS LIKE US . THE RAWAET OF AYESHA BEING 6-9 AT NIKAH & RUKHSA TI MAKES THE RASOOL AS PER THAT BOOK A PEDOPHILE, A CHILD MOLESTOR (ma’az Allah) WHILE IN REAL ACTUALITY WHEN THE RAsool e KAREEM OUT OF EXTREME COMPASSION TO MITIGATE THE PROBLEM OF ABU BAKR WHEN HIS DAUGHTER’S PREVIOUS MAN JUBAYR IBNE MUTEEM REFUSED TO TAKE HER AND HER FATHER WAS TORMENTED AS WHO WILL NOW MARRY SUCH LADY OBLIDGED HIM BY TAKING HIS DAUGHTER IN HIS NIKAH WHILE SHE WAS ACTUALLY 21 BUT NEVER LESS THAN TWENTY (REF. After deep research by Mahmoud Aqqad of Egypt).

THERE ARE OTHER FALSE , FABRICATED ABSURD AND OBCENE OR VULGER NARRATION WHICH A GENTLEMAN CAN NOT READ TO HIS FAMILY MEMBERS. IS IT NOT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE RASOOL(s) TO RELIEVE HIMSELF STANDING BY THE SIDE OF A TRASH DUMP?, OR SAY THAT ALLAH WILL PUT ONE OF HIS MASSIVE LEGS IN THE JAHANNUM FIRE, OR SUGGEST AYESHA (ra)TO BREAST FEED BEARDED MEN OR THE SHAITAAN LOUDLY RELEASING WIND (ma’az Allah) OR HIS WIFE IN THE PERIOD OF JANABAH WITH HER HUSBAND’S HEAD ON HER LAPS . THESE ARE ONLY THE FEW OF THE HUNDREDS OF AHADEES IN THE SO CALLED SAHEEH WHICH AHLE SUNNAH ARE PROUD OF AS THE BASIS OF THEIR SO CALLED RELIGION OF ISLAM , CAN BE CHECKED IN SAHEEH BOKHARI .
ONE AHLE SUNNAH U.S.DOCTER SHABBIR AHMAD,PUBLISHED MORE THAN HUNDRED AHADEES FROM SAHEEH BOKHARI WHICH HE TERMED AS PORN. NOW IF A MAJOR SECTION OF SO CALLED MUSLIMS BELIEVE THESE AHADEES AS THE WORDS OF THE RASOOL E ISLAM , MY SEVEN SALAAMS TO THIS WIERD , ABSURD, INNOVATED RELIGION WHICH I DON’T BELIEVE , COULD BE FROM ALLAH . MY RELIGION OF ISLAM IS ONLY THE ONE FROM RASOOL & AHLEBAYT .& THE BOOK OF ALLAH WHICH ARE TRANSLATED AS QORA’AN E NATIQ & QORA’AN E SAMIT RESPECTIVELY .WE LOVE THEM BOTH AND HATE THEIR HATERS BURNERS, ENEMIES &TORMENTORS IN THE GARB OF MUNAFEQEEN .
ALLAHS CURSES & LA’AN ARE DUE FOR THESE ZALEMEEN WA MUNAFEQEEN .

ZAHEER HUSAIN KHAN

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:18:41 +0000
To: zaheerhusain@hotmail.com
From: comment-reply@wordpress.com
Subject: [New comment] Sunni Answers to Shiapen: The Shi’a rejection of the Sahah Sittah

Respond to this comment by replying above this line
New comment on In Defense of the Aal & Ashaab

antitrinity commented on Sunni Answers to Shiapen: The Shi’a rejection of the Sahah Sittah.
in response to Slaves of Allah:
Sunni Answers to Shiapen: The Shi’a rejection of the Sahah Sittah In The Name of Allah, The Beneficent, The Merciful. This is our refutation of infamous Shiawebsite “Shiapen.com” which was formerly known as Answering-Ansar.org. The following is a response to ShiaPen’s article entitled: “The Shi’a rejection of the Sahah Sittah”. In this article we will […]
As-salamu alaikum, brothers. Please, I would like you to write an article about shubha that Abu Bakr and ‘Umar (radi Allahu ‘anhum) banned writing hadiths. Russian-salafi audience need an article about this issue. You would help thousands of people. Please, I ask you to write an article about that. Jazakumu-Llahu hairan

FATWAS ARE GIVEN BY HIGHLY EDUCATED , QUALIFIED ULEMAH WHO ARE RECOGNISED AS MUTTAQI & PERHEZGAAR TOO .
EVERY TOM DICK & HARRY, MULLAH IS NOT ENTITLED TO ISSUE FATWAH . NO ONE SHOULD LISTEN SUCH FATWAH OR HEED THEM.

IT IS NECESSARY TO UNDERSTAND , WHAT IS INNOVATION , WHICH IS REALLY SHIRK & BIDA’T .
ONLY THOSE ACTIONS WHICH INFRINGE , INTERFERE , ADD OR SUBSTRACT IN THE FINALISED AHKAMAAT E DEEN IS BIDA’A .
ANY SOCIAL , TRADITIONAL CIVIL OR MILITTERY FUNCTION WHICH DO NOT CLASH WITH THE ASL DEEN HAS ABSOLUTELY NO TABOO.THIS IS TRUE AS LONG AS IN THOSE FUCTIONS A BELIEVER DON’T HAVE TO DO A HARAAM ACT INCLUDING CONSUMING PROHIBITED ITEMS .
WEARING ANY PARTICULAR COLOR DRESS , CARRYING FLOWERS HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH DEEN .
A BOY & A GIRL GOES TO MEET WITH GOOD INTENTION AND REFRAINS FROM ANY INDECENT ACT OR ANY PROHIBITED ACT,THERE IS NO HARM NO RESTRICTION AT ALL.CALLING IT BIDA’A SHIRK OR HARAAM IS FOOLISH .
FINDING FAULT IN EVERY THING WHICH WAS NOT DONE BY THE RASOOL E KAREEM (s) HAS NO MEANING OR ELSE USE OF ANY MOTOR VEHCLES OR ALL MODERN INVENTIONS SHALL BECOME HARAAM FOR YOU , MAKING IT A BIDA’A, SOUNDS ABSURD & NONSENSE TAKES ONE TO THE STONE AGE .

YES EID , BAQRID ARE EIDAIN WITH CERTAIN OBLIGATORY RITUALS CONNECTED TO IT, BUT EVERY FUNCTION BASED ON ANY JOYOUS EVENT LIKE BIRTHDAYS OF PROPHET (s) OR HIS ITRAH & THEIR PROGENY OR ANY OTHER IMPORTANT EVENT IN THE ISLAMIC HISTORY IS AN OCCASSION WHICH ARE PERFECT TO CELEBRATE RATHER IS A BLESSINGS AND KAR E SAWAB FOR IT INVOLVES THE HOLY RECITATIONS OF QORANIC VERSES, PIOUS RECITATIONS OF FAZAELS , NOBLE TAZKIRA & DISTRIBUTION OF TABARRUKS , FEASTS & CHARITY DONATIONS .

ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF CIVILISED BELIEVERS AND DO NOT SENDS ITS ADHERANTS TO BACKWARDNESS AND IGNORANCE OF
THE AGE OF JAHILIYAH.

ZAHEER HUSAIN KHAN
——————————————–
On Sat, 14/2/15, c [the-criterion-world] wrote:

Subject: {TCW} fatwa: Celebrating Valentine’s Day – Eid ul-Hubb [1 Attachment]
To: the-criterion-world@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, 14 February, 2015, 6:38 AM
 
Celebrating ‘Eid ul-Hubb
(Holiday of Love, or Valentine’s
Day)
 
Question:
 
In the
recent times there has
spread the celebrating of ‘Eid ul-Hubb (Valentine’s Day)
– particularly among
the female students. And it is a holiday from the holidays
of the Christians,
and the clothing will be completely in red garments and
shoes, and they exchange
red flowers with each other. We hope from your eminence an
explanation of the
ruling of celebrating the likes of this holiday. What is
your advice to Muslims
regarding the likes of these affairs, and may Allaah
preserve you and protect
you?
 
Answer:
 
In the
Name of Allaah, the Most
Merciful, the Giver of Mercy

Wa ‘alaykumus-salaam wa
rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuh.
 
Celebrating the Holiday
of Love (i.e. Valentine’s
Day) is not permissible for various reasons.
 
The first: That is an
innovated holiday that has
no basis for it in the Sharee’ah.
 
The second: That it calls
to passion and
infatuation.
 
The third: That it calls
to busying the heart
with the likes of these affairs that are trivial and opposed
to the guidance of
the Righteous Predecessors (As-Salaf us-Saalih), may Allaah
be pleased with
them.
 
So it is not permissible
to introduce on this day
(i.e. Valentine’s Day) anything from the aspects of
holiday celebrating,
regardless of whether it is foods, or drinks, or clothing,
or exchanging gifts,
or other than that. It is incumbent upon the Muslim to be
distinguished and
noble with his religion, and that he not be a characterless
person who follows
everyone who cries out.
 
I ask Allaah, the Most
High, to protect the
Muslims from all of the trials, whatever is apparent or
hidden of them, and that
He guards over us with His care and His aid.
 
Muhammad Saalih Al-‘Uthaymeen on
5/11/1420
hijri.
Al-Muftee: Muhammad bin Saalih
Al-‘Uthaymeen
  Source of the Fatwaa: Majmoo’
Rasaa’il wa Fataawaa
Ash-Shaikh Muhammad bin Saalih
Al-‘Uthaymeeneists
 

http://salaf-us-saalih.com/2013/02/13/celebrating-eid-ul-hubb-holiday-of-love-or-valentines-day-shaykh-muhammad-saalih-al-uthaymeen-permanent-committee

King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz R.I.P.

23/01/2015 LEAVE A COMMENT
People who have been following me for some years will know I’m not particularly a fan of Saudi Arabia. I therefore have mixed feelings on the passing of King Abdullah. Nevertheless, it is not my way to think ill of the dead…
Without doubt, Saudi Arabia has many problems. How many of these the late king is responsible for, is not easy to say. While Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy, in practice this does not mean the king really has absolute power, there are many other forces at play.
To be honest, my main gripe is with the Wahabi “religious” establishment who were empowered by King Abdullah’s father, but not King Abdullah himself. Credible sources inform me that privately the king had issues with them himself. King Abdullah even made ziyarat to the mazar of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him.

When King Abdullah visited Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, seeking forgiveness and guidance, who are we to judge? May Allah SWT forgive him and grant him jannah.
Inna lillahi wa inna ilayhi raji’un.

King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz R.I.P. dead .

zaheerhusain says:

I don’t know what do you mean by RIP . It is true that after the death I should not say ill of any one but it is natural that when you hate an entire community of deviants whose elders in around one hundred fiFty years invaded the most sacred karbala , killed millions since then , demolished our most sacred Aasaar e Ahlebayt (A S ) and revived , rearmed the so called islamic Terrorism which had started with a terrorist attack on the door of the Farzand e Rasool’s mother killing her son the Prophet had named in advance as Mohsin and she herself succumbed to the injuries inflicted on her and now it reappeared from there and the royality helped, finnanced and encouraged it in every possible way .
If the entire family of the infidel wahabic Royalty is wiped out, not a single tear will flow from my dried eyes which has swollen from the weepings for my near and dear ones who have been the victims of their Terrorism in Pakistan, Afghanistan,iraq ,Bahrain and Syria . They are all my brothers and sisters and were killed only for they do not subscribe to wahabbism, they are true muslims .

REPLY TO MUBASHIR HAYAAT & MAULVI SAEED SIDDIQUE
.
EVERY ONE WHO CAME IN CONTACT WITH THE APOSTLE OF ALLAH CAN BE TERMED AS A COMPANION, TRANSLATED AS SAHABAH . THERE WERE SOME WHO CAME IN CONTACT WITH THE RASOOL E AKRAM(saawaws)AND BECAME SO INFLUENCED , SO MUCH TRANSFORMED THAT THE RASOOL (s) CALLED HIM AS A MEMBER OF AHLEBAYT , LIKE HAZRAT SALMAAN E FARSEE . THERE WERRE OTHERS VERY NOBLE TOO LIKE HAZRAT ABU ZARR GHAFFARI , HAZRAT JABIR IBNE ABDULLAH ANSARI , HAZRAT AWAIS E QARNI THEN THERE WERE SEVERAL OTHERS WHO EMBRACED ISLAM AND REMAINED STEADFAST TILL THEIR END . MANY OF THEM LAID THEIR LIFE IN PROTECTION OF ISLAM . THERE WERE ALSO SUCH WHO NEVER TOOK ISLAM FROM THEIR HEART, EVEN SUCH WHO WERE SNAKES OF THE SLEEVE , AT THE SLIGHTEST DANGER TO THEIR PERSON.RAN AWAY , EVEN LEFT BEHIND THE RASOOL E KAREEM WHEN HE WAS BADLY INJURED , EVEN WAGED WAR ON THE PROGENY OF RASOOL , ATTACKED WITH BURNING LOGS AT THE DOOR OF PROPHET’S DAUGHTER KILLING HER SON IN THE WOMB . ALLAH CALLED THEM MUNAFIQS AND REVEALED A VERSES OF MUNAFEQOON ON THEM . THEY WERE ASTRAYED REMAINED ASTRAYED TILL END THEIR PLACE IS HELL .

HAZRAT ALI (a s ) WAS DIVINELY APPOINTED KHALIFAH BILA FASL. ONLY ALLAH APPOINTS KHALIFAH.
THE APPOINTMENT CAME ABOUT AT GHADEER E KHUM WITNESSED BY 1,20.000 PEOPLE.ALL HAJIS .
IT IS A HISTORICAL FACT THAT SHAIKHAIN PAID THEIR ALLEGIANCE ON THE HANDS OF ALI (a s ) .
WHEN THEY USURPED HIS KHILAFAT , HE DID NOT FIGHT FOR WORDLY RULERSHIP . IT WAS BEYOND HIS DIGNITY.

THERE WAS NO MARITAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE USURPERS AND FAMILY OF AHLEBAYT (a s).
UMAR BIN KHATTAB ‘S STORY WEDDING H.ALI’S DAUGHTER IS BASELESS, MYTH ,CONCOCTION & IMPOSSIBILITY.
H.ZAINAB & H UMME KULSOOM WERE IN THE EVENT OF KARBALA & WERE MADE PRISONER.WERE MARRIED TO H.ALI’S BROTHERS SONS . A VERY WELL KNOWN FACT , VERY WELL RECORDED.
UMAR HAD MARRIED TWO OTHERS BY THE NAME OF UMME KULSOOM .IT WAS A VERY COMMON NAME .
ALI ( a s) DID NOT CONFRONT IN THE MATTER OF KHILAFAT , HELPED THE RULERS IN THE MATTERS OF DEEN WHEN REQUESTED. UMAR OFTEN SAID ”YA ALI (a) IF YOU WERE NOT THERE, I WAS A DEAD MAN ” (Referring a pregnant women whom he had declared death sentence ,H Ali (a) prevented her execution for obvious reasons)
THESE ARE UNDENIABLE FACTS AND ONE CAN FIND THE REFERENCES IN AHLE SUNNAH NARRATIONS TOO .

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Mubashir Inayet wrote:
Yeh Ummat riwayaat mein kho gai.

Not only that now they have started reading riwayat into the Quran.

Ali not only accepted the Khilafat of all other Sahabas but inter married between them too.

Now go figure.

Allah hi Hafiz !!

Subject: LA FATAH ILLA ALI (a) LA SAIF ILLA ZULFIQAAR

SAEED SIDDIQI SAYS RASOOL E KAREEM (saawaws) HAD NO MALE ISSUE .SO WHAT ? JUST BECAUSE OF THAT NO HEIR .

ABSOLUTELY WRONG & MISGUIDED . UNDER ISLAMIC SHARIYAH THERE ARE TWO SHARES OF SONS AGAINST ONE FOR DAUGHTERS HOWEVER IN THE ABSENSE OF A MALE ISSUE, THE ENTIRE INHERITANCE GOES TO THE DAUGHTER . AS SUCH JANAB E SAYYADAH SALAM ALLAH ALAIHA WAS THE ONLY HEIR OF THE RASOOL E KAREEM (saawaws) SHE WITH HER HUSBAND HAZRAT ALI (a s ) IS THE HEIR APPARENT OF THE RASOOL E MAQBOOL AND HAVE A LARGE PROGENY . IF YOU WOULD HAVE UNDERSTOOD , SURA E KAUSER, ALLAH SAYS ” I GRANTED YOU A LARGE PROGENY ” , HOW ? ONLY FROM HIS DAUGHTER AND HER HUSBAND .

THE INFIDELS TAUNTED, SO THIS VERSE WAS REVEALED BUT THE FOLLOWERS OF MUNAFEQEEN DON’T WANT TO ACCEPT IT BECAUSE THEY WANT TO JUSTIFY THE CONFISCATION.OF FADAK AND THE USURPATION OF KHILAFAT WHICH WAS DIVINELY SET
TO BE OFFERED TO THE RASOOLS SUCCESSOR WHO MAY NOT BE HIS BIOLOGICAL SON BUT LIKE HIS OWN . WAS THE CLANDESTINELY IMPOSED RULER WAS NOT THE ONE WHO ALONG WITH HIS DEPUTY, FROM OVER SEVENTY PROMINENT SAHABAH
PAYED THEIR ALLEGIANCE ON THE HANDS OF MAULAH (a s ) AT GHADEER. WAS UMAR IBNE KHATTAB CAME RUNNING AND SAID ”YA ABUL HASAN, FROM NOW YOU ARE OUR MASTER & THE MASTER OF ENTIRE BELIEVERS UMMAH”

MAULVI SAHAB , HADEES E SAQLAIN NOT ONLY IS MOTAWATIR BUT WELL ACCEPTED BY BOTH SUNNI & SHIA AND IT SAYS ”INNI TAREKUM FI SAQLAIN KITAB ALLA WA ITRATI WA AHLEBAYTI, THEY WILL NOT BE SEPERATED FROM EACH OTHER , FOLLW BOTH , YOU WILL NOT GET ASTRAY” . THE ASTRAYED SHAMELESSLY SAY ”YOU HAVE TO FOLLOW ONLY ALLAH AND RASOOL” . IT IS FINAL THAT TO REMAIN A MUSLIM, ONE HAS TO OBEY ALLAH, TO FOLLOW RASOOL , TO FOLLOW THE QORA’AN AND FINALLY AND COMPULSORILY OBEY THE AHLEBAYT . LEAVE ASIDE ANY OF THEM AND YOU ARE GONE ASTRAY, YOU BECOME UNBELIEVER , YOUR HEREAFTER DOOMED .
IT WILL BE AN ADVANTAGE FOR YOU TO GO THROUGH THIS VIDEO : http://www.abubakr.org can you handle the truth

The term Ahl signifies the members of a household of a man, including his fellow tribesmen, kin, relatives, wife or wives, children and all those who share a family background, religion, housing, city and country with him.
Bayt refers to habitation and dwelling, whether tented or built. It can also be roughly translated as “household”. The Ahl-Al-Bayt of a person refers to his family members and all those who live in his house. Ahlul Bayt is the polite form of addressing the members and wife of the family.

In the Qur’an
In Verse 33:33 of the Holy Quran, there is a change to masculinity of the Arabic text ‘ankom’ which symbolises the ‘Ahlul Bayt’, it is also believed, that as this specific verse came down, it was when the prophet Muhammed (s) had been sitting with the members of Ahlul Bayt ( Ali, Fatima, Hassan and Hussein). According to some interpretations, the Qur’an also implicitly refers to Ahl al-Bayt in 42:23 using the term al-qurbā.
There is a consensus amongst Sunni and Shi’a Muslims that the “Ahl al-Kisa” hadith refers specifically to Ali, Fatimah, Hasan and Husayn. Mention of the Ahl al-Bayt, Muhammad’s household, is present in a verse of the Qur’an as follows ;
O wives of the Prophet! you are not like any other of the women; If you will be on your guard, then be not soft in (your) speech, lest he in whose heart is a disease yearn; and speak a good word.
And stay in your houses and do not display your finery like the displaying of the ignorance of yore; and keep up prayer, and pay the poor-rate, and obey Allah and His Messenger. Allah only desires to keep away the uncleanness from you, O people of the House! and to purify you a (thorough) purifying.
And keep to mind what is recited in your houses of the communications of Allah and the wisdom; surely Allah is Knower of subtleties, Aware.
—Sura Al-Ahzab (33), ayat 32-34.
The precise definition of the term in this verse has been subject to varying interpretations. In one tradition, according to which Muhammad’s (S) companion Salman al-Farsi is included as a member, it is used to distinguish from the muhajirun (Muslim emigrants from Mecca) and ansar (Medinan converts to Islam).
Further members of the household, according to the Sunni perspective, include Ali, Fatimah, Hasan and Husayn, who are mentioned in the tradition of the mantle.. Thus, according to the Encyclopaedia of Islam, “[t]he current orthodox view is based on a harmonizing opinion, according to which the term ahl bayt includes the ahl al-ʿabāʾ, i.e. the Prophet, ʿAlī, Fāṭima, al-Ḥasan and al-Ḥussain, According to Laura Veccia Vaglieri in Encyclopaedia of Islam “there is a story narrated in many traditions according to which Muḥammad sheltered under his cloak, in varying circumstances including the Mubahala, his grandchildren Ḥasan and Hussein, his daughter Fatimah and his son-in-law Ali; and therefore it is these five who are given the title Ahl al-Kisa or “People of the Mantle”. Some have attempted to add Muḥammad’s wives to the list; however, the number of the privileged is limited to these five.

Other interpretations include the family of Ali, as well as the families of Muhammad’s relatives such as Aqeel, Ja’far, and ‘Abbas ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib|al-Abbas. Early Islamic jurists Malik ibn Anas and Abū Ḥanīfa included the clan of Banu Hashim within the definition, while al-Shafi’i included the whole of Banu Muttalib.[1]

In Shia thought, the household is limited to Muhammad, Fatimah, Ali, Hasan, Husayn, and their descendants (altogether known as the Ahl al-Kisa); as per their deduction from the tradition of the mantle. They interpret the change in pronoun in the Qur’anic verse as showing that only the aforementioned members constitute Ahl al-Bayt.[1] Madelung writes that “[t]his change of gender has inevitably contributed to the birth of various accounts of a legendary character, attaching the latter part of the verse to the five People of the Mantle.”[10] Shias view these individuals as infallible and sinless Imams and regard devotion to them as an essential part of the religion.

Shia Muslims also support this claim with a hadith mentioned in the Sunni Ṣaḥīḥ collection. Many Sunni scholars remark that the verse of purification was revealed concerning five people: Muhammad, Ali, Fatimah, Hasan and Husayn.

‘A’isha reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) went out one morning wearing a striped cloak of the black camel’s hair that there came Hasan b. ‘Ali. He wrapped him under it, then came Husain and he wrapped him under it along with the other one (Hasan). Then came Fatima and he took her under it, then came ‘Ali and he also took him under it and then said: Allah only desires to take away any uncleanliness from you, O people of the household, and purify you (thorough purifying)

The most authentic hadith among Shias is attributed to Fatimah Zehra (s) narrated by Hazrat Jabir Ibne Abdullah Ansari who is most respected by both Shias and Ahle Sunnah wal Jama’a .Ansari (r a ) narrates that when all the five came under the canopy of the kisa e Yamani , then the Rasool e Kareem (s) supplecated ” Ya Allah these are my Ahlebayt , keep all kind of rijs away from them ” and then this portion of Aya e tatheer ” innama yureedullah …..”was revealed by the Angel Jibraeil (A S ).

The tradition about this hadith goes from different sources to Fatimah (s), the daughter of Muhammad. She narrated that once her father visited her home, he had fever and was not feeling well, he asked for a Yemeni cloak which Fatimah (s) brought to him and folded it around him. Later he was joined in that Yemeni cloak by his grandsons Hasan (a) and Hussein (a), who were followed by their father Ali ibn Abi Talib (a), who was cousin and son-in-law of Muhammad (s). Finally Fatimah (s) asked the permission to enter that cloak. When all five of them joined together under the cloak, Muhammad narrated the Qur’anic verse 33:33 to those under the cloak that all five of them are chosen ones, and he further stated that he wants God to keep all impurities out of reach and away from all of us. Muhammad then prayed to God to declare all five of them as his Ahlul Bayt and keep away the Najasat (impurities). God, at that request immediately sent Gabriel (Jibral) to
reveal to Muhammad that all the five under the cloak are dearest and closest to God and they are Taher (“purest of the pure”) without any traces of impurities.
It is also reported from Umme Salmah (s) the mother of believer in whose house the Ayat was revealed that she asked can she also come inside the canopy of kissa , the rasool e kareem (s) praised her, gave her great tidings but said you are well where you are . Now if that wife was not included in the privillaged five there is absolutely no question of any other wives included in the Ahlebait ‘ Further it must be noted that in the same verse there was strict instructions ” not to go out of the house ” which other mothers of believers followed so strictly that they did not go out even to perform Hajj , while one of the wife not only went out of the house but she waged a war with none else but the husband of her own step daughter who at that time was undisputed Khalifa e Rashidoon . The Shias regard him & justifiably too as divinely appointed bila fasl .

Now the Ummah have every justification to finally believe that only the blood relation progeny are the only one entitled to be included in the Ahlebait e Rasool (saawaws) and the wives are outside the perview of the Ayat e Taharat and worthy of great reverence & respect .The absence of Sahabah and the mother of believers from the team MOBAHILAH is further proof despite Allah’s open command for both the parties to bring your men, women and children but while all the wives and sahabas were very much available , rather keen to be waiting but the Rasool e Kareem took among his NAFS , as Ali Ibne Abi Talib (a) , among his women only his daughter Fatima Zehra (s) and among his children, his two grandsons Hasan (a) and Husain (a)., Indeed these Panjatan Paak are only thoroughly purified .

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.